CW Dispute Resolution Conference 2026 Highlights Early Action as Key to Avoiding Construction Disputes

The first panel focused on how construction disputes often begin on site, long before any legal action starts. Moderated by Julianne Tolentino, the discussion featured Alison Eslick of Reed Smith, Khushboo Shahdadpuri of Al Tamimi & Company, Richard Davies of Addleshaw Goddard, Sean Cameron of Linklaters, and Mathew Hazenberg of Accuracy.

Panellists said early warning signs — such as unclear scope, unrealistic schedules, coordination gaps, incomplete contracts, and delayed decisions — are often visible but not addressed quickly enough. They also emphasized that weak documentation, poor reporting, and limited transparency can turn manageable issues into formal disputes.

The second panel examined how pressure, delays, and rising costs affect project decisions. Moderated by Pranati Yekula of Construction Week Middle East, the session featured Hany Saleh of Omnium Resolve, Manus Bradley of Secretariat, and Gilbert Boustany of 3d Consultants.

Speakers highlighted the need for structured prioritisation, fact-based decisions, and early identification of the main drivers of delay. They noted that delays affecting the critical path, costs, or delivery are more likely to create contractual consequences, especially as supply chain disruptions and geopolitical pressures continue to affect materials and logistics.

The final panel looked at how disputes can be managed more constructively. Moderated by Shehzin Shaikh, the discussion brought together Ahmed El Bayouk of Drake & Scull, Alim Khamis of Gateley Middle East, Nawal Hend of BSA Law, and Stefan Panourgias of Composite Consult.

Panellists said many disputes are shaped by early project decisions, including risk allocation, compressed timelines, unclear responsibilities, and underdeveloped scopes. They also noted that internal misalignment can harden positions before legal teams become involved. Earlier engagement, direct communication, and stronger internal governance can help parties address issues before they move into formal dispute processes.

For contractors in the UAE, the discussions reinforced a practical message: dispute prevention starts with project discipline from day one. Clear scopes, realistic schedules, strong documentation, timely decisions, and open communication are essential for reducing commercial and contractual risk.

As projects in the region continue to grow in scale and complexity, contractors may need stronger internal processes to identify risks earlier and respond before issues become formal claims. Digital tools can support this process, but technology alone is not enough. The real advantage comes from combining accurate records, accountable teams, and a culture that addresses problems early.